🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Benefit advisers. Insurance brokers. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? You should be. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical business owner. Neither the average worker. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Is More Than Complex, It Is Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes regarding tax credits that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating for our current Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. How our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would need contributions from both workers and companies. In similar programs, a worker earning moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments also cover pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs versus what we pay on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution in the US

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. This includes both worker and company payments. Similar to many federal military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and Medicare taxes, rather than individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make it easier to plan expenses our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for employers since we wouldn't have access to our employees' health histories for weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs that employ the majority of the country's workers and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible employees to be healthier, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases experienced in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and less expensive strategy both for managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality in the world, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this current situation could be that we take a hard look in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.